What's Your Curl Pattern? Treating Your Type Right

We get it — hair is complicated. Although some days you may wake up feeling flawless, other days can see your hair-do in a mood right when you have somewhere important to be. Having the right styling products on your side is essential in these frizzy, frenzied moments...but with so many options, how do you know what hair care is right for you? 

Identifying your unique curl pattern is the first step in helping your natural hair shine. Of course, doing so can be easier said than done, and categorizing your curls is sometimes a source of controversy. Here are the basics on finding your hair type and treating it right! 

Eap heat

The Four Primary Hair Types

At the simplest level, there are four main categories for hair type:

  • Type 1: Straight
  • Type 2: Wavy
  • Type 3: Curly
  • Type 4: Coily

In most cases, you'll be able to tell what category you fall into just by glancing in the mirror. But your hair is too unique to simply fit into one of four boxes! That's where the A-C subcategories come in. These letters help denote the width of your hair pattern, with As being the widest and Cs the thinnest. 

For example, a woman with Type 3A curls would have a thicker and looser pattern, while those with Type 4C would experience tighter coils. Some women may have multiple patterns throughout their head, so it's worth taking some time to really investigate your one-of-a-kind follicles. This is easiest done when your hair is wet. 

Taking Care of Your Natural Curl Pattern

Once you have a better idea of your hair's natural canvas, cleaning and styling will be much easier! For more information on enhancing your hair's perfect patterns, check out EAP Heat's blog and hairstyling products

Curl pattern

What's your curl pattern and how did you initially find out what it was? Leave your answers below, each one teach one!


  • bymikpgwkg

    Muchas gracias. ?Como puedo iniciar sesion?

  • LorenaBlairembam

    Dating websites get matched up with some liability

    California cracked down this week on online dating sites and it’s about time.

    say Atty. The site’s computers had inspired that the woman and the man would make a good couple.

    “Consumers should be able to use websites without the fear of being scammed or targeted, Harris menti one d. Wurtzel pleaded no contest a month earlier to a charge of sexual battery.

    Wurtzel drove the woman home after their second date at a new jersey restaurant. He followed her into her residence, Where he held her down and assaulted her, criminal arrest said.

    The woman subsequently checked the national sex offender registry and found that Wurtzel had six separate listings.

    The heavyweights of the online dating sites industry said they were keen to do everything possible to prevent situations like this from happening again.

    Her resolve forpersistance to higher standards was echoed by the heads of EHarmony and Spark Networks.

    About 40 million Americans used an online dating service service last year, Spending more than $1 billion in their digital searches for soul mates, The personal injury lawyer general’s office said. One in six couples that married in the last three years met via an online dating service personals service.

    With phone numbers like those, It’s tremendous that it took this long for industry leaders to take an obvious step toward protecting customers. Yet continue to, Their resolve to users’ safety is tenuous at best.

    The agreement signed with Harris is nonbinding and carries no enforcement penalties. for example, The dating sites can’t be sued if they come up short in vetting would be members.

    I’m not saying that websites should be held accountable for every real world trespass linked to the virtual world. it goes without saying there’s only so much anyone can do to keep a bad guy at bay.

    But it’s clear that stronger safeguards are required not just for virtual matchmakers but all websites providing a platform for people to interact and transact business.

    Since the initial days of the Net, Website operators have argued that they can’t be held accountable for what users might do online.

    Their stance was enacted into law under Section 230 of the speaking Decency Act of 1996, which usually holds that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of afrointroductions details provided by another information content provider,

    put differently, If you’re EBay and someone is selling Nazi collectibles and singing the praises of Hitler, it’s your fault (despite the reality EBay officially bans such practices).

    fans of Craigslist made a similar argument after Philip Markoff, A 24 yr old former medical student, Was accused of killing a masseuse he met the actual website in 2009. Markoff later entirely suicide in a Boston jail, And cl closed down its “Adult organizations” theme.

    I’m all totally free speech, And I know it’s a slippery slope any time someone speaks about putting any kind of limit on what can happen online.

    But it seems to me that Section 230 is too blunt an instrument to be applicable to a wired world as we know it today. The Net is no longer a drooling little newborn that has to be stroked and cuddled to keep it from bursting into tears.

    The Net is all surfaced, And grown up liabilities should apply.

    “organization is not anything like it was in 1996, And our laws are barely always keeping pace, asserted Tim Bukher, A New York lawyer focusing on Internet law and intellectual property.

    He said element 230 “Provides immunity for web stores that are passive conduits” that will be, Not tampering at all with users’ posts.

    But when a dating site starts running criminal record checks on applicants, Or when a listings site actively seeks to dam prostitutes and child molesters, Or even when a publication site starts moderating comments, It’s doubtful whether that site can still claim to be "passive,

    “Once you start taking part in the discussion, Bukher said, "It can be argued to be able to be liable under the law,

    this is usually sensitive area, And any changes to the law should reflect and respect 1st Amendment points to consider.

    all together, I don’t see why a web business should be any less responsible for what happens within its cyber walls than a real world business. If you slipped and fell in a bricks and mortar store, big event grounds for a lawsuit. But the digital realm has different rules.

Leave a Comment